Are climate taxes used as tools to tackle environmental challenges in food industry?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5219/scifood.84Keywords:
climate tax, public expenditure, fiscal policy, environmental policy, environmental protection, food industryAbstract
This paper examines the nexus between climate taxes and environmental expenditures, which affect industries that significantly contribute to pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, including the food and agriculture industry. The expectation of a statistically significant positive relationship between climate tax revenues and environmental protection expenditure assumes that when countries aim to mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on the environment by introducing climate taxes, they should spend the revenue generated on environmental protection. The regression analysis is conducted on a sample that comprises 30 European countries from 2000 to 2023, including 27 current European Union members and Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland. To address potential differences across countries, the sample is divided into subsamples using cluster analysis, and the time period is divided into subperiods to capture potential turbulence caused by economic and non-economic shocks. The regression analysis results are ambiguous and presented in a descriptive rather than causal manner. By testing the expectation about the positive relationship between climate tax revenues and environmental protection expenditures several turnovers in the relationship are revealed, which corresponds to the periods of crises hampering the economies and causing the a shift away from policies improving the environment in favor of countercyclical government interventions, and other external factors, such as changes in environemtal policy, mainly adopted in the EU countries.
References
1. Akdag, S., Yildirim, H., & Alola, A. A. (2024). Comparative benefits of environmental protection expenditures and environmental taxes in driving environmental quality of the European countries. Natural Resources Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12464
2. Famulska, T., Kaczmarzyk, J., & Grząba-Włoszek, M. (2022). Environmental Taxes in the Member States of the European Union—Trends in Energy Taxes. Energies, 15(22), 8718. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228718
3. Oates, W. E. (1995). Green Taxes: Can We Protect the Environment and Improve the Tax System at the Same Time? Southern Economic Journal, 61(4), 915. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1060731
4. Liobikienė, G., Butkus, M., & Matuzevičiūtė, K. (2019). The Contribution of Energy Taxes to Climate Change Policy in the European Union (EU). Resources, 8(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020063
5. Knežević, G., & Pavlović, V. (2020). Environmental Tax Revenue and Expenditures in EU and Serbia - Lessons to be Learnt from Statistics. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 18(3), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.4335/18.3.503-522(2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4335/18.3.503-522(2020)
6. Zhan, Z., Stokoe, P., Gonguet, F., Wendling, C., Haščič, I., Mante, F., & Rodríguez, M. C. (2023). Environmental Taxes and Government Expenditures on Environmental Protection. In Arslanalp, S., Kostial, K, Quirós-Moreno, G. (Eds).: Data for a Greener World, pp. 43-58. International Monetary Fund.
7. Esen, Ö., Yıldırım, D. Ç., & Yıldırım, S. (2021). Pollute less or tax more? Asymmetries in the EU environmental taxes – Ecological balance nexus. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 91, 106662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106662
8. Chen, H., Singh, B., Gangopadhyay, P., Tanin, T. I., & Das, N. (2025). Threshold effects of environmental tax on climate vulnerability. International Review of Economics & Finance, 103, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104429
9. Georgieva, V. (2024). Environmental Investments and Climate Change: How Environmental Protection Expenditure and Gross Domestic Product Affect Emissions in the European Union. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 12(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d12.0528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d12.0528
10. Stern, D. I. (2018). The Environmental Kuznets Curve ☆. In Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.09278-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09278-2
11. He, P., Ya, Q., Chengfeng, L., Yuan, Y., & Xiao, C. (2019). Nexus between Environmental Tax, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from China, Finland, and Malaysia Based on a Panel-ARDL Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(3), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2019.1658068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1658068
12. Dahmani, M. (2023). Environmental quality and sustainability: exploring the role of environmental taxes, environment-related technologies, and R&D expenditure. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 26(2), 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-023-00387-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-023-00387-9
13. Eurostat (2025a). Government expenditure on environmental protection. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title= Government_expenditure_on_ environmental_protection#Evolution_of_environmental_protection_expenditure
14. Kinyar, A., & Bothongo, K. (2025). Public spending for environmental protection in the UK: The environmental impact of environmental taxes, renewable energy, and nuclear energy. Energy, 314, 134117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134117
15. Eurostat (2025b). Eurostat Database. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database
16. South, A., Michael, S., & Massicotte, P. (2025). rnaturalearthdata: World Vector Map Data from Natural Earth Used in 'rnaturalearth'. R package version 1.0. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rnaturalearthdata
17. Pebesma, E., & Bivand, R. (2023). Spatial Data Science. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429459016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429459016
18. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2. In Use R! Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
19. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2014). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation [Dataset]. In CRAN: Contributed Packages. The R Foundation. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.dplyr DOI: https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.dplyr
20. Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., & Hornik, K. (2025). cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. R package version 2.1.8.1 — For new features, see the 'NEWS' and the 'Changelog' file in the package source). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cluster
21. Croissant, Y., & Millo, G. (2008). Panel Data Econometrics inR: TheplmPackage. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i02
22. Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. In Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
23. Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., & Lüdecke, D. (2022). Methods and Algorithms for Correlation Analysis in R. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b3ecw DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b3ecw
24. European Commission. (2019). A European Green Deal: Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
25. Cleveland, C. (2025). Government expenditures on environmental protection. Institute of Global Sustainability, Boston University. Available at: https://visualizingenergy.org/government-expenditures-on-environmental-protection/
26. Fulai, S. (1997). Public environmental expenditures: a conceptual framework. Macroeconomics for Sustainable Development Program Office, World Wide Fund For Nature.
27. Bobáková, V., & Mihaliková, E. (2019). Public Expenditure for the Environmental Protection in Slovakia. TEM Journal, 921–927. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem83-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM83-33
28. Barrell, A., Dobrzanski, P., Bobowski, S., Siuda, K., & Chmielowiec, S. (2021). Efficiency of Environmental Protection Expenditures in EU Countries. Energies, 14(24), 8443. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248443
29. Martínez Córdoba, P. J., Ramos, V. C., Gómez, E. Z., & Gómez, J. L. Z. (2025). Efficiency of Public Spending on Environmental Protection: The Role of Renewable Energy, Governance and Fossil Fuel Subsidies. Sustainable Development, 33(S1), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70008
30. Ercolano, S., & Romano, O. (2017). Spending for the Environment: General Government Expenditure Trends in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 1145–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1695-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1695-0
31. United Nations (n.d.), “Sustainable Development Goals”, Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Sustainable Development, United Nations. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
32. Caglar, A. E., & Yavuz, E. (2023). The role of environmental protection expenditures and renewable energy consumption in the context of ecological challenges: Insights from the European Union with the novel panel econometric approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 331, 117317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117317
33. Aydin, C., & Esen, Ö. (2018). Reducing CO2emissions in the EU member states: Do environmental taxes work? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(13), 2396–2420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1395731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1395731
34. Niu, B. (2024). Government environmental protection expenditure and national ESG performance: Global evidence. Innovation and Green Development, 3(2), 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100117
35. Wen, J., Yin, H.-T., Jang, C.-L., Uchida, H., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Does corruption hurt green innovation? Yes – Global evidence from cross-validation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122313
36. Yilmaz, S. (2025). The Impact of Environmental Protection Expenditures on Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Sustainability, 17(7), 3192. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073192
37. Bozatli, O., & Akca, H. (2024). Effectiveness of environmental protection expenditures and resource tax policy in the Netherland’s load capacity factor: Do government effectiveness and renewable energy matter? Evidence from Fourier augmented ARDL. Resources Policy, 92, 105030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105030
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lenka Maličká (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
This license permits non-commercial use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction of the work in any medium or format, provided that:
-
appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and the original publication in Scifood,
-
a link to the license is provided,
-
the work is not modified, adapted, or transformed.
