Development of technology for producing protein hydrolysates from leguminous plants (peas) for sports nutrition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5219/scifood.6Keywords:
highly digestible food products, pea hydrolysates, sports nutrition, protein concentrates, enzymatic hydrolysisAbstract
In line with emerging trends, the sports nutrition industry actively seeks cost-effective and health-promoting protein ingredients to replace animal-derived products and transition toward more sustainable practices. Protein concentrates derived from legumes, including peas, have attracted consumer interest due to their rich amino acid profiles and favourable functional properties. Our research aimed to develop and optimise an enzymatic technology for producing protein hydrolysates from locally adapted pea varieties in Kazakhstan. Based on the research findings, optimal technological conditions for protein extraction from peas via enzymatic methods were established: pea flour-to-water ratio (hydromodule) 25%; duration of water extraction 24 hours; concentration of added pepsin enzyme 4.0%; pepsin fermentation time 24 hours; concentration of added pancreatin enzyme 4.0%; pancreatin fermentation time - 5 hours. A pilot batch of enzymatically hydrolysed pea protein concentrate was produced under laboratory conditions, and analyses were performed on the resulting concentrate derived from the Aksary pea variety. The protein concentrate contained 8.92% crude protein and 5.38 ± 0.02 mg/mL amino nitrogen. Notably, due to the amino acid L-arginine at 0.540±0.216% and lysine at 0.587±0.199%, the hydrolysate can be utilised as a component of sports supplements to support muscle mass development. This work was conducted as part of the project "Development of a technology for producing protein-vitamin concentrates based on plant raw materials for sports nutrition" within the framework of the scientific-technical program BR22886613, titled "Development of Innovative technologies for the processing and storage of agricultural crop production and raw materials". The project is funded under the 267-budget program "Enhancing the accessibility of knowledge and scientific research", subprogram 101 "Program-targeted financing of scientific research and activities" of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2024–2026.References
1. Dent, T., & Maleky, F. (2022). Pulse protein processing: The effect of processing choices and enzymatic hydrolysis on ingredient functionality. In Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (Vol. 63, Issue 29, pp. 9914–9925). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2070723
2. Grimble, G. K. (2000). Mechanisms of Peptide and Amino Acid Transport and Their Regulation. In Nestlé Nutrition Workshop Series: Clinical & Performance Program (pp. 63–88). KARGER. https://doi.org/10.1159/000061797
3. Manninen, A. H. (2009). Protein hydrolysates in sports nutrition. In Nutrition & Metabolism (Vol. 6, Issue 1, p. 38). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-6-38
4. Morifuji, M., Ishizaka, M., Baba, S., Fukuda, K., Matsumoto, H., Koga, J., Kanegae, M., & Higuchi, M. (2010). Comparison of Different Sources and Degrees of Hydrolysis of Dietary Protein: Effect on Plasma Amino Acids, Dipeptides, and Insulin Responses in Human Subjects. In Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (Vol. 58, Issue 15, pp. 8788–8797). American Chemical Society (ACS). https://doi.org/10.1021/jf101912n
5. Yuan, J., Jiang, B., Li, K., Shen, W., & Tang, J. L. (2017). Beneficial effects of protein hydrolysates in exercise and sports nutrition. Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents, 31(1), 183–188.
6. M.J, D., R.L, T., A.M, C., P.R.C, H., A, B., & J.D, B. (2015). Protein hydrolysates and recovery of muscle damage following eccentric exercise. In Functional Foods in Health and Disease (Vol. 5, Issue 1, p. 34). Functional Food Center. https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v5i1.164
7. Phillips, S. M. (2004). Protein requirements and supplementation in strength sports. In Nutrition (Vol. 20, Issues 7–8, pp. 689–695). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.009
8. Kim, I.-Y., Schutzler, S., Schrader, A., Spencer, H. J., Azhar, G., Ferrando, A. A., & Wolfe, R. R. (2016). The anabolic response to a meal containing different amounts of protein is not limited by the maximal stimulation of protein synthesis in healthy young adults. In American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (Vol. 310, Issue 1, pp. E73–E80). American Physiological Society. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00365.2015
9. Areta, J. L., Burke, L. M., Ross, M. L., Camera, D. M., West, D. W. D., Broad, E. M., Jeacocke, N. A., Moore, D. R., Stellingwerff, T., Phillips, S. M., Hawley, J. A., & Coffey, V. G. (2013). Timing and distribution of protein ingestion during prolonged recovery from resistance exercise alters myofibrillar protein synthesis. In The Journal of Physiology (Vol. 591, Issue 9, pp. 2319–2331). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.244897
10. Henchion, M., Hayes, M., Mullen, A., Fenelon, M., & Tiwari, B. (2017). Future Protein Supply and Demand: Strategies and Factors Influencing a Sustainable Equilibrium. In Foods (Vol. 6, Issue 7, p. 53). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6070053
11. Nikbakht Nasrabadi, M., Sedaghat Doost, A., & Mezzenga, R. (2021). Modification approaches of plant-based proteins to improve their techno-functionality and use in food products. In Food Hydrocolloids (Vol. 118, p. 106789). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106789
12. Godfray, H. C. J., Aveyard, P., Garnett, T., Hall, J. W., Key, T. J., Lorimer, J., Pierrehumbert, R. T., Scarborough, P., Springmann, M., & Jebb, S. A. (2018). Meat consumption, health, and the environment. In Science (Vol. 361, Issue 6399). American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5324
13. Berrazaga, I., Micard, V., Gueugneau, M., & Walrand, S. (2019). The Role of the Anabolic Properties of Plant- versus Animal-Based Protein Sources in Supporting Muscle Mass Maintenance: A Critical Review. In Nutrients (Vol. 11, Issue 8, p. 1825). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081825
14. Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition. Report of an FAQ Expert Consultation. (2013). FAO food and nutrition paper, 92, 1–66.
15. Bessada, S. M. F., Barreira, J. C. M., & Oliveira, M. B. P. P. (2019). Pulses and food security: Dietary protein, digestibility, bioactive and functional properties. In Trends in Food Science & Technology (Vol. 93, pp. 53–68). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.08.022
16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2016). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016: Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
17. Carbonaro, M., & Nucara, A. (2022). Legume Proteins and Peptides as Compounds in Nutraceuticals: A Structural Basis for Dietary Health Effects. In Nutrients (Vol. 14, Issue 6, p. 1188). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14061188
18. Olagunju, A. I., Omoba, O. S., Enujiugha, V. N., Alashi, A. M., & Aluko, R. E. (2018). Antioxidant properties, ACE/renin inhibitory activities of pigeon pea hydrolysates and effects on systolic blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rats. In Food Science & Nutrition (Vol. 6, Issue 7, pp. 1879–1889). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.740
19. Sánchez-Chino, X. M., Jiménez Martínez, C., León-Espinosa, E. B., Garduño-Siciliano, L., Álvarez-González, I., Madrigal-Bujaidar, E., Vásquez-Garzón, V. R., Baltiérrez-Hoyos, R., & Dávila-Ortiz, G. (2018). Protective Effect of Chickpea Protein Hydrolysates on Colon Carcinogenesis Associated With a Hypercaloric Diet. In Journal of the American College of Nutrition (Vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 162–170). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2018.1487809
20. Matemu, A., Nakamura, S., & Katayama, S. (2021). Health Benefits of Antioxidative Peptides Derived from Legume Proteins with a High Amino Acid Score. In Antioxidants (Vol. 10, Issue 2, p. 316). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020316
21. Boye, J., Zare, F., & Pletch, A. (2010). Pulse proteins: Processing, characterization, functional properties and applications in food and feed. In Food Research International (Vol. 43, Issue 2, pp. 414–431). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.003
22. Palander, S., Laurinen, P., Perttilä, S., Valaja, J., & Partanen, K. (2006). Protein and amino acid digestibility and metabolizable energy value of pea (Pisum sativum), faba bean (Vicia faba) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) seeds for turkeys of different age. In Animal Feed Science and Technology (Vol. 127, Issues 1–2, pp. 89–100). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.07.003
23. Barac, M., B., Pesic, M., B., Stanojevic, S., P., Kostic, A., Z., & Cabrilo, S., B. (2015). Techno-functional properties of pea (Pisum sativum) protein isolates: A review. In Acta Periodica Technologica (Issue 46, pp. 1–18). National Library of Serbia. https://doi.org/10.2298/apt1546001b
24. Lam, A. C. Y., Can Karaca, A., Tyler, R. T., & Nickerson, M. T. (2016). Pea protein isolates: Structure, extraction, and functionality. In Food Reviews International (Vol. 34, Issue 2, pp. 126–147). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2016.1242135
25. Boschin, G., Scigliuolo, G. M., Resta, D., & Arnoldi, A. (2014). ACE-inhibitory activity of enzymatic protein hydrolysates from lupin and other legumes. In Food Chemistry (Vol. 145, pp. 34–40). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.076
26. Roy, F., Boye, J. I., & Simpson, B. K. (2010). Bioactive proteins and peptides in pulse crops: Pea, chickpea and lentil. In Food Research International (Vol. 43, Issue 2, pp. 432–442). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.002
27. Boston Consulting Group. (2021). The benefits of plant-based meats. Retrieved [insert retrieval date], from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2021/the-benefits-of-plant-based-meats (Retrieved May 28, 2024).
28. Czelej, M., Garbacz, K., Czernecki, T., Wawrzykowski, J., & Waśko, A. (2022). Protein Hydrolysates Derived from Animals and Plants—A Review of Production Methods and Antioxidant Activity. In Foods (Vol. 11, Issue 13, p. 1953). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11131953
29. GOST 13496.4-2019. Feed, compound feeds, compound feed raw materials—methods of determination of nitrogen and crude protein content. (2019). Moscow, Standardinform.
30. GOST R 51417-99. Feeds, Mixed feeds, and raw materials. Determination of the mass fraction of nitrogen and calculation of the mass fraction of crude protein. Kjeldahl method. (1999). Moscow, Russian Federation Gosstandart.
31. GOST 13496.15-2016. Feeds, mixed feeds, mixed feed raw materials. Methods of determination of the mass fraction of crude fat. (2020). Moscow, Standardinform.
32. GOST 8756.13-87. Fruit and vegetable processing products. Methods for determination of sugars. (2010). Moscow, Standardinform.
33. GOST 13496.3-92. Feedstuffs, feed raw materials. Methods of moisture determination. (2011). Moscow, Standardinform.
34. GOST R 51418-99. Feedstuffs, compound feeds, feed raw materials—methods for determination of ash fraction of total mass insoluble in hydrochloric acid. (2003). Moscow, Russian Federation Gosstandart.
35. Skurikhin, I. M. (1987). Chemical composition of food products. Book 1. Moscow: Agropromizdat.
36. GOST 32343-2013. Feeds, compound feeds. Determination of calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, sodium and zinc content by atomic absorption spectrometry method. (2020). Moscow, Standardinform.
37. GOST 30692-2000. Fodders, mixed fodders and animal raw foodstuff. Atomic absorption method for determination of copper, lead, zinc and cadmium. (2000). Minsk, Inter-Governmental Council on Standardization, Metrology, and Certification.
38. GOST R 51433-99. Fruit and vegetable juices. Method for determination of soluble solids content with refractometer. (2008). Moscow, Russian Federation Gosstandart.
39. GOST 25555.0-82. Fruit and vegetable products. Methods for determination of titratable acidity. (2010). Moscow, Standardinform.
40. GOST 13496.2-91. Feed, mixed feed, mixed feed raw materials. Method for determination of crude fiber. (2002). Inter-Governmental Council on Standardization, Metrology, and Certification.
41. GOST 26176-2019. Methods for determination of soluble and hydrolysable carbohydrates. (2019). Moscow, Standardinform.
42. GOST 13496.17-2019. Methods for determining carotin. (2019). Moscow, Standardinform.
43. GOST 31483-2012. Determination of vitamins: B1 (thiamine chloride), B2 (riboflavin), B3 (pantothenic acid), B5 (nicotinic acid and nicotinamide), B6 (pyridoxine), Bc (folic acid), C (ascorbic acid) by capillary electrophoresis. (2012). Moscow, Standardinform.
44. GOST R 54037-2010. Foodstuffs. Determination of the content of water-soluble antioxidants content by amperometric method in vegetables, fruits, products of their processing, alcoholic and soft drinks. (2019). Moscow, Standardinform.
45. GOST 13496.19-2015. Methods for determination of nitrate and nitrite. (2020). Moscow, Standardinform.
46. GOST 30692-2000. Methods for determining toxic elements: lead, cadmium in plant raw materials and processing products. (2001). Moscow, Russian Federation National Committee for Standardization and Metrology.
47. GOST 26930-86. Raw material and foodstuff. Method for determination of arsenic content. (2010). Moscow, Standardinform.
48. GOST 26927-86. Raw material and food-stuffs. Methods for determination of mercury. (2010). Moscow, Standardinform.
49. GOST 30711-2001. Methods for detection and determination of aflatoxins B1 and M1 content. (2001). Minsk, Inter-Governmental Council on Standardization, Metrology, and Certification.
50. ST RK 2011-2010. Water, foods, food and tobacco products: Determination of organochlorine pesticides by chromatographic methods. (2010). Astana, Committee for Technical Regulation and Metrology of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
51. GOST 29311-92. Pancreatic hydrolyzates for bacterial nutrient media. General specifications. (2004). Moscow, IPC Publishing house of standards.
52. GOST ISO 11737-2-2011. Sterilization of medical devices. Microbiological methods. Part 2. Tests of sterility performed in the validation of a sterilization process. (2013). Moscow, Standardinform.
53. Kubczak, M., Khassenova, A. B., Skalski, B., Michlewska, S., Wielanek, M., Skłodowska, M., Aralbayeva, A. N., Nabiyeva, Z. S., Murzakhmetova, M. K., Zamaraeva, M., Bryszewska, M., & Ionov, M. (2022). Hippophae rhamnoides L. leaf and twig extracts as rich sources of nutrients and bioactive compounds with antioxidant activity. In Scientific Reports (Vol. 12, Issue 1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05104-2
54. Van Belle, G. Statistical rules of thumb. (2011). John Wiley & Sons.
55. Tulbek, M. C., Lam, R. S. H., Wang, Y. (C. ), Asavajaru, P., & Lam, A. (2017). Pea. In Sustainable Protein Sources (pp. 145–164). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802778-3.00009-3
56. Boye, J. I., Aksay, S., Roufik, S., Ribéreau, S., Mondor, M., Farnworth, E., & Rajamohamed, S. H. (2010). Comparison of the functional properties of pea, chickpea and lentil protein concentrates processed using ultrafiltration and isoelectric precipitation techniques. In Food Research International (Vol. 43, Issue 2, pp. 537–546). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.021
57. Smits, M., Verhoeckx, K., Knulst, A., Welsing, P., de Jong, A., Houben, G., & Le, T.-M. (2021). Ranking of 10 legumes according to the prevalence of sensitization as a parameter to characterize allergenic proteins. In Toxicology Reports (Vol. 8, pp. 767–773). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.03.027
58. Goldstein, N., & Reifen, R. (2022). The potential of legume-derived proteins in the food industry. In Grain & Oil Science and Technology (Vol. 5, Issue 4, pp. 167–178). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaost.2022.06.002
59. Akharume, F. U., Aluko, R. E., & Adedeji, A. A. (2021). Modification of plant proteins for improved functionality: A review. In Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 198–224). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12688
60. Sharif, H. R., Williams, P. A., Sharif, M. K., Abbas, S., Majeed, H., Masamba, K. G., Safdar, W., & Zhong, F. (2018). Current progress in the utilization of native and modified legume proteins as emulsifiers and encapsulants – A review. In Food Hydrocolloids (Vol. 76, pp. 2–16). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.01.002
61. Möller, A. C., Li, J., van der Goot, A. J., & van der Padt, A. (2022). A water-only process to fractionate yellow peas into its constituents. In Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (Vol. 75, p. 102894). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102894
62. Hamuro, Y., Coales, S. J., Molnar, K. S., Tuske, S. J., & Morrow, J. A. (2008). Specificity of immobilized porcine pepsin in H/D exchange compatible conditions. In Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (Vol. 22, Issue 7, pp. 1041–1046). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3467
63. Pownall, T. L., Udenigwe, C. C., & Aluko, R. E. (2010). Amino Acid Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Pea Seed (Pisum sativum L.) Enzymatic Protein Hydrolysate Fractions. In Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (Vol. 58, Issue 8, pp. 4712–4718). American Chemical Society (ACS). https://doi.org/10.1021/jf904456r
64. Barbana, C., & Boye, J. I. (2010). Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity of chickpea and pea protein hydrolysates. In Food Research International (Vol. 43, Issue 6, pp. 1642–1649). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.05.003
65. Goertzen, A. D., House, J. D., Nickerson, M. T., & Tanaka, T. (2020). The impact of enzymatic hydrolysis using three enzymes on the nutritional properties of a chickpea protein isolate. In Cereal Chemistry (Vol. 98, Issue 2, pp. 275–284). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10361
66. Andriamihaja, M., Guillot, A., Svendsen, A., Hagedorn, J., Rakotondratohanina, S., Tomé, D., & Blachier, F. (2012). Comparative efficiency of microbial enzyme preparations versus pancreatin for in vitro alimentary protein digestion. In Amino Acids (Vol. 44, Issue 2, pp. 563–572). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-012-1373-0
67. Whitcomb, D. C., & Lowe, M. E. (2007). Human Pancreatic Digestive Enzymes. In Digestive Diseases and Sciences (Vol. 52, Issue 1, pp. 1–17). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9589-z
68. da Silva, R. R. (2017). Bacterial and Fungal Proteolytic Enzymes: Production, Catalysis and Potential Applications. In Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (Vol. 183, Issue 1, pp. 1–19). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-017-2427-2
69. Zhang, M.-N., Huang, G.-R., & Jiang, J.-X. (2011). Iron binding capacity of dephytinised soy protein isolate hydrolysate as influenced by the degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. In Journal of Food Science and Technology (Vol. 51, Issue 5, pp. 994–999). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0586-7
70. Moro, T., Brightwell, C. R., Velarde, B., Fry, C. S., Nakayama, K., Sanbongi, C., Volpi, E., & Rasmussen, B. B. (2019). Whey Protein Hydrolysate Increases Amino Acid Uptake, mTORC1 Signaling, and Protein Synthesis in Skeletal Muscle of Healthy Young Men in a Randomized Crossover Trial. In The Journal of Nutrition (Vol. 149, Issue 7, pp. 1149–1158). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxz053
71. Kamei, Y., Hatazawa, Y., Uchitomi, R., Yoshimura, R., & Miura, S. (2020). Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Function by Amino Acids. In Nutrients (Vol. 12, Issue 1, p. 261). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010261
72. Manzano, M., Girón, M. D., Salto, R., Burgio, C., Reinoso, A., Cabrera, E., Rueda, R., & López-Pedrosa, J. M. (2023). Arginine and Lysine Supplementation Potentiates the Beneficial β-Hydroxy ß-Methyl Butyrate (HMB) Effects on Skeletal Muscle in a Rat Model of Diabetes. In Nutrients (Vol. 15, Issue 22, p. 4706). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15224706
73. Li, G., Li, Z., & Liu, J. (2024). Amino acids regulating skeletal muscle metabolism: mechanisms of action, physical training dosage recommendations and adverse effects. In Nutrition & Metabolism (Vol. 21, Issue 1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-024-00820-0
74. Pszczola, D. E. (2002). Genes and diet: The specialized role ingredients may play. Food Technology, 54(5), 82–84.
75. FAO/WHO. (1991). Protein quality evaluation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
76. Sosulski, F. W., & NcCurdy, A.R. (1987). Functionality of Flours, Protein Fractions and Isolates from Field Peas and Faba Bean. In Journal of Food Science (Vol. 52, Issue 4, pp. 1010–1014). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14263.x
77. Paredes‐López, O., Ordorica‐Falomir, C., & Olivares‐Vázquez, M. R. (1991). Chickpea Protein Isolates: Physicochemical, Functional and Nutritional Characterization. In Journal of Food Science (Vol. 56, Issue 3, pp. 726–729). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb05367.x
78. Gorissen, S. H. M., & Witard, O. C. (2017). Characterising the muscle anabolic potential of dairy, meat and plant-based protein sources in older adults. In Proceedings of the Nutrition Society (Vol. 77, Issue 1, pp. 20–31). Cambridge University Press (CUP). https://doi.org/10.1017/s002966511700194x
79. Gorissen, S. H. M., Crombag, J. J. R., Senden, J. M. G., Waterval, W. A. H., Bierau, J., Verdijk, L. B., & van Loon, L. J. C. (2018). Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates. In Amino Acids (Vol. 50, Issue 12, pp. 1685–1695). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-018-2640-5
80. Pinckaers, P. J. M., Trommelen, J., Snijders, T., & van Loon, L. J. C. (2021). The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion. In Sports Medicine (Vol. 51, Issue S1, pp. 59–74). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01540-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Massimzhan Velyamov, Zhumatay Urazbayev, Shukhrat Velyamov, Turar Bakytzhan, Aelina Abitbekova (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
